Thirty-four point eight percent of dentists who don't currently use AI say charting and note-taking is the task they most want to hand to it, ahead of insurance verification, ahead of imaging, ahead of everything else on the list, according to the American Dental Association's Health Policy Institute, "Dentists Use AI to Make Appointments More Efficient, but Draw the Line at Clinical Decision Making," published July 2026. It is the clearest, best-documented demand signal in dentistry's entire AI market, and we covered what that gap between intent and installed base means for practice buying decisions in an earlier piece: 43% of dentists use AI, but not for notes. This article picks up where that one left off: four vendors have now built products aimed squarely at that demand, and getting a straight answer on what any of them costs takes a phone call.
Four launches, one demand category, zero published prices
Planet DDS introduced AI Voice Perio inside its Denticon platform on February 3, 2026, the first voice-powered periodontal charting tool built into that system, according to the company's own announcement via Morningstar. It followed on April 2, 2026 with AI Voice Restorative Charting, extending voice-driven documentation to decay, existing restorations, fractures, and treatment plan entries, "the highest-volume clinical task in general dentistry," per Planet DDS's press release on BusinessWire. Neither announcement states a price. Pearl, which describes itself as dental AI's global leader, announced Pearl Voice on April 8, 2026, an ambient documentation tool that converts doctor-patient conversation into SOAP notes and periodontal charts in real time, again with no price disclosed in the announcement or in the trade coverage that followed from Dentistry Today, Becker's Dental Review, and Compendium. Henry Schein One's Dentrix Voice, built on Bola AI's voice-charting technology, is the same story: the integration is documented, the price is not, per both companies' own product pages.
That is three of the four major 2026 AI charting launches with no public number attached. The fourth is more instructive, because it does have a public number, just not for the product that actually charts.
The $49 that doesn't buy what dentists say they want most
Denti.AI announced in an August 2025 press release, distributed via PR Newswire, that it had cut its Detect product (FDA-cleared X-ray analysis) to $49 per location per month, with founder and CEO Dmitry Tuzoff quoted saying "we've dropped Denti.AI Detect to $49 per month because that's what it should cost." That is a real, specific, publicly quoted price, and it is the only one attached to the Denti.AI name in any primary source found for this article. The same release introduced Auto-Chart 2, the product that actually does what the ADA's survey respondents say they want: it layers live voice capture onto the radiograph AI, listening to chair-side conversation and recording the complete odontogram, tooth, surface, code, and status, directly into the practice management system. Auto-Chart 2's pricing was not announced. The release offered a waitlist instead. Third-party dental software reviewers (The Molar Report, review.dental) checking back in mid-2026 confirm the same gap: Denti.AI's Detect and Voice Perio products carry reported figures ($49 per location per month and $10 per user per month respectively, per those reviewers, not Denti.AI's own current pricing page, so treat those two numbers as reviewer-reported rather than vendor-confirmed), while Auto-Chart 2's price remains, in The Molar Report's own words, unpublished.
So what for you: if you see "$49 dental AI" in a headline or a sales email, check exactly which product that number is attached to before you build a budget around it. In Denti.AI's own case, it is the X-ray tool, not the charting tool.
Why the pricing goes quiet exactly where the demand is highest
There is a pattern here worth naming plainly. Planet DDS's own press release for AI Voice Restorative Charting says the product is "designed for dental support organizations (DSOs) and multi-location dental groups." Pearl markets Pearl Voice the same way, to organizations, not to a named per-seat rate. This site has flagged the same enterprise-pricing pattern before in AI phone agent and billing comparisons: the more a vendor's product targets multi-location groups and DSOs, the more likely its price sits behind a sales call rather than a rate card, because enterprise pricing scales with location count, contract length, and negotiating power in ways a fixed monthly fee cannot capture. Denti.AI's own Detect pricing, by contrast, is aimed at "qualified DSOs and partners" too, yet still carries a public number, which suggests the opacity is a deliberate sales-process choice for the charting-specific products, not an inherent feature of selling to dental groups.
So what for you: an unpublished price is not, by itself, evidence a tool is expensive or bad value. But it does mean every one of these four vendors has chosen to make you ask before you can compare, and that choice shifts real work onto a practice owner who is already stretched, exactly the group least equipped to run four separate sales calls before making a decision.
If you are trying to compare AI charting vendors and keep hitting "contact us" instead of a price, that is a useful data point on its own, not a dead end. Book a free 20-minute call and we will walk through what to ask each vendor before you get on a call with their sales team.
What actually changes your position on the call
The evidence points toward one clear move: do not request a demo first. Request a written quote for the specific feature set you would actually use, charting, not the vendor's cheapest headline product, before you agree to a demo call at all. A vendor that answers a written pricing request with a number is showing you something about how they sell. A vendor that answers with "let's find time to talk" is not necessarily hiding an inflated price, but they are choosing to control the framing of that conversation, and it is reasonable to ask why before you hand over 45 minutes of your week. For a two-site or expanding practice specifically, get the quote for your actual location count in writing before the call too. Enterprise pricing tends to move on scale, and a number quoted verbally on a call is far easier for a vendor to adjust upward later than a number they have put in an email.
So what for you: the upper hand in these conversations belongs to whoever asks the more specific question first. "What does AI charting cost?" gets you a sales call. "What does Auto-Chart 2, or AI Voice Restorative Charting, cost per provider per month for a two-location practice?" gets you closer to an actual number, or at minimum, tells you quickly whether the vendor is willing to give you one.
The honest state of this market right now
Third-party aggregators researching this category report a general range, roughly $99 to $399 per provider per month for AI charting tools broadly, with discounts at multi-provider and DSO scale. That figure is a composite estimate pulled from listed and reviewer-reported prices across a wider set of vendors, not a quote from any of the four vendors named in this article, and it should be treated as a rough planning anchor rather than a number you can hold any specific company to. The honest summary is this: the ADA's own data says charting and note-taking is where dentists most want AI to go next, the vendors have noticed and built the products, and as of this writing not one of the four highest-profile 2026 charting launches will tell you what their product costs without a conversation first.
That gap between demand and pricing transparency is not going to close on its own, and it will not close before your next budget conversation either. The dentists who get the better deal here will not be the ones who wait for prices to become public. They will be the ones who ask the narrowest, most specific pricing question first and put it in writing.
The Clinical AI Briefing
One practical AI insight for healthcare practices every week. No hype. Evidence and outcomes only.
Related: 43% of dentists use AI, but not for notes · 43.3% of dentists use AI. 22.8% is imaging. · the AI Opportunity & Growth Assessment
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, clinical, or financial advice. Vendor pricing changes frequently; confirm current pricing directly with each vendor before making a purchasing decision. This article does not endorse or recommend any named vendor over another.